International Fair Trial Day (IFTD) Steering Group invites you to join the IFTD Mexico Conference on Wednesday June 14th, which will take place in Mexico City in Dr. Guillermo Floris Margadant room, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas of UNAM from 10:00 to 18:00. Participation in the Conference is free.
Focus Country of 2023: Mexico Call for Nominations for the Ebru Timtik Award 14 June 2023, Mexico City/Mexico
In 2021, a group of lawyers and lawyers’ organisations came together to establish an annual International Fair Trial Day (IFTD) to be observed every year on 14 June. This initiative is supported by more than 100 legal associations across the world, all of which are committed to the vital importance of the right to a fair trial and the serious challenges to due process rights worldwide. They established a Steering Group for the organization of IFTD. The Steering Group agreed that in each subsequent year, one country –where fair trial rights are being systemically violated– would be chosen as the focus country, and an event would be organized to mark IFTD, as well as a series of activities around the event to draw attention to the situation in that country. The events include holding a conference on systemic fair trial issues and making a public statement with concrete recommendations on how to tackle these. The decision to establish an IFTD was also accompanied by the establishment of the Ebru Timtik Award. Ebru Timtik is a lawyer from Turkey who lost her life on 27 August 2020 as a result of a 238-day hunger strike she undertook to protest against the systemic violations of fair trial rights which people in Turkey are facing. Every year, on the occasion of the IFTD, the Ebru Timtik Award is made by an independent jury to an individual or individuals and/or an organisation who have or which has made a significant contribution to the defence and promotion of the right to a fair trial in the focus country. The first IFTD focus country chosen was Turkey, in 2021. A virtual conference was held on 14 June 2021, to mark the occasion. The first Ebru Timtik Award was granted posthumously to Ebru Timtik herself. The second conference, which focused on the systemic fair trial issues in Egypt, took place in Palermo/Italy on 17-18 June 2022. Mohamed El-Baqer and Haitham Mohammadein, two Egyptian human rights lawyers who were in detention at the time, received the Ebru Timtik Award.
2023 International Fair Trial Day Focus Country: Mexico The Steering Group has expanded since 2021 to include a number of other prominent organisations taking part in the work, all as listed below. Several nominations were received for this year’s IFTD focus country. Following due consideration of the proposals, Mexico has been chosen as the focus country of 2023. This decision is based on the following: Reports on the situation in Mexico illustrate that many parts of the judicial system in the country suffer from systemic corruption, lack of effective protection of due process rights, ineffective and delayed investigations and trials, discrimination, and improper government influence. Accordingly, there are concerns that the judiciary of some courts and regions fail to provide an effective and timely remedy for those who are wrongly accused of violent crimes or who are victims of crimes or human rights abuses. This becomes more striking against the backdrop of an extremely high violent crime rate and impunity. Evidence of corruption within the judiciary and investigative authorities, among other state institutions, remains a fundamental concern. Reports emphasize that the involvement of the state security forces and prosecutors in criminal activities and ‘serious and widespread human rights violations, including torture, enforced disappearances, and extrajudicial killings with near total impunity’ is an acute problem. While Mexico is overall defined as a partially free country in the Freedom House Freedom in the World Report (with a 60/100 ranking), rule of law-related factors in the assessment downgrade Mexico’s ranking. Accordingly, the ‘due process rights protection’ ranking of the country is only ¼, while the ‘judicial independence’ ranking is 2/4. The Global Rule of Law Index of the World Justice Project places Mexico at the rank of 115 out of 140 countries worldwide. Mexico’s ‘criminal justice’ ranking in the Index is 128/140, while the ‘civil justice’ ranking is 131/140. The country is among the worst 10 countries when it comes to ‘corruption,’ ranking 134/140. Enforced disappearances and summary executions remain one of the most important human rights issues in the country, with the state institutions consistently failing to find an effective solution. In 2021 alone, at least 7,698 missing or disappeared person cases were reported, bringing the total number since 1964 to more than 100,000 people. The UN Committee on Enforced Disappearances visited Mexico in 2021 and shared its findings in 2022. These findings drew attention to the urgency and seriousness of the issue and urged the Mexican authorities to, among others, increase their efforts to combat enforced disappearances, take genuine steps to eradicate structural impunity, and facilitate coordination between different state institutions. Mexico is rated as one of the most dangerous countries for human rights defenders working on organized crimes, corruption, and crimes by state agents. They are targeted, face attacks, and, in some cases, are killed, abducted, and tortured for their legitimate human rights activities by members of organized groups or state agents. 15 journalists were killed between January and September 2022, and between January – June 2022, 12 human rights defenders were killed in Mexico. Despite the seriousness of these crimes, the cases often remain unresolved with impunity shielding those who are responsible. Arbitrary, prolonged, and unlawful pretrial detention, in many cases without any charges, is a further systemic issue in the Mexican justice system. Ordering pretrial detention is an obligation for the judicial authorities for those charged with several crimes without any regard to the evidence or circumstances of the case file. The widely criticized arraigo detention that allows prosecutors to obtain detention authorization for up to 40 days without a charge is a further problematic practice used to undermine the due process rights of the accused. These broad powers are extensively used by the judicial and prosecutorial authorities and as a result of their frequent application, prisons are overcrowded and prisoners face systematic human rights abuses and dire prison conditions. In an October 2021 filing of an application to the Inter-American Court on Human Rights, the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights underlined some of these systemic issues, particularly those related to the use of detention, torture, and ill-treatment within Mexico’s criminal justice system, and recommended that Mexico:
‘Adapt the country’s legal system to permanently eliminate the concept of arraigo, including the constitutional and legal norms that uphold this practice. While this is being implemented, ensure that all judicial operators who are called upon to apply the concept of arraigo cease to do so by invoking conventionality control, in light of the corresponding inter-American standards.
Provide appropriate training for officials working at the Office of the Deputy Attorney General of Tlalnepantla concerning the absolute prohibition of torture and cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment during investigations of all crimes, including those that relate to organized crime, and implement a simple, easily accessible system for reporting any such acts.’ Similarly, in a September 2022 statement, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention called on Mexico to urgently abolish mandatory pre-trial detention provided under the Constitution. According to the Committee, ‘[o]ne of the most serious consequences of mandatory pre-trial detention has been that many Mexicans spend more than a decade deprived of their liberty, awaiting trial, without sentence and in conditions of serious risk to their lives and personal integrity. It also contributes to prison overcrowding.’ In a judgment published in January 2023, the Inter-American Court on Human Rights also condemned the pre-procedural arraigo as well as the pretrial detention regulated in the 1999 Federal Code of Criminal Procedure, contrary to the American Convention on Human Rights. The Court ordered Mexico to: a) annul (dejar sin efecto) the provisions related to pre-procedural arraigo in its domestic law; and b) adapt its internal legal system on pretrial detention. Against this dire background, the Organising Committee of the IFTD agreed that focusing on Mexico in 2023 will help draw more attention to the systemic fair trial violations in the country. It will provide support to many human rights defenders, including lawyers and journalists, and judges who are still being targeted for their legitimate activities, who are arbitrarily prosecuted, detained, and who face trials severely lacking in due process and failing to respect fair trial principles. The IFTD conference will be held on 14 June 2023 in Mexico and will be co-hosted by Mexico-based organisations. Further details of the agenda and the speakers who will participate in the conference will follow over the next few months. For now, we invite you to hold the date.
Call for nominations for the Ebru Timtik Award The Organising Committee of the IFTD would like to also invite you to nominate one or more individual(s) or an organisation for the Ebru Timtik Award from amongst those who have demonstrated outstanding commitment and sacrifice in upholding fundamental values related to the right to a fair trial in Mexico. The individual(s) or organisation nominated for the award must be or have been active in defending and or promoting the right to a fair trial in Mexico through either his/her/their/its recent outstanding piece of work in relation to this fundamental right or his/her/their/its distinguished long-term involvement in fair trial issues.
The deadline for nominations is 2 May 2023.
To nominate, please send your nominations to nominationsetaward@gmail.com in English and kindly include: (1) the candidate’s detailed bio, (2) a letter signed by the nominating organisation/group of individuals explaining the reasons why they/it consider(s) that the candidate should be granted the Award, and (3) one recommendation/supporting letter from an unrelated, external organisation, if the application is submitted by a group of individuals. For the details of the award criteria and process please see the attached “Selection criteria for the grant of the Ebru Timtik Fair Trial Award”. After the deadline, a jury composed of independent individuals who are experienced with the right to a fair trial, including one or more from the focus country, will review and assess the nominations and determine the award recipient(s).
Delegation of 60+ International Trial Observers Condemns Court Judgment in Decade-Long Criminal Prosecution of 21 Lawyers from ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers Association) and HHB (People’s Law Office): Delegation Warns That “The World is Watching”
This week, we – more than 60 lawyers from 9 countries representing more than 30 bar associations, NGOs and professional lawyers’ associations – have been observing the final hearings in the mass trial that started in 2013 against 22 lawyers from the ÇHD (Progressive Lawyers Association) and the HHB (People’s Law Office). There are now only 21 left, as Ebru Timtik died – hunger-striking for a fair trial – in the course of these proceedings.
Today,
these lawyers have been convicted on charges of membership in a terrorist
organization and participating in terrorist propaganda, and lengthy prison
sentences have been imposed.
These
convictions and sentences are in total violation of the right to a fair trial, the
U.N. Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers and the rule of law.
The only
material facts brought to the Court were strictly linked to the defendants’
professional activities as lawyers in the field of human rights: taking part in
a press conference, being present in or near a protest, advising clients of
their right to remain silent, defending suspects charged with terrorism, etc.
During the inquiry, some of the accused lawyers were subjected to wiretapping
for over a year, in an apparent violation of the sanctity of legal professional
privilege.
The U.N.
Basic Principles specifically guarantee the right of lawyers to participate in
public debate and to associate with each other and, further, state that lawyers
must never be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes, nor suffer
prosecution for any action in accordance with their professional duties.
Moreover,
our colleagues were deprived of their right to a fair trial. Their request for
sufficient time to present their defence was denied by the Court, which allowed
only five short days of hearings for 21 defendants, and rejected the
defendants’ request to postpone the hearing in order to permit a proper
examination of the evidence, in particular electronic documents the authenticity
of which is seriously questioned.
The trial
was held in a courtroom at Silivri prison, with heavy police presence. The defendants
were separated from their lawyers by two lines of police officers, hindering the
ability of the defendants and their lawyers to communicate with
confidentiality.
The
defendants’ rights were also violated by the failure to complete proceedings
within a reasonable time, as the trial has been ongoing for ten years without a
proper justification for the protracted proceedings.
In
addition, for several of the defendants, this trial relies on facts and
evidence that have already been used in the 2017 trial against seven of the
same defendants, in violation of the principle that no one should be tried
twice for the same offense.
Finally, we
are deeply concerned about the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law.
In attacking these lawyers for their defense of human rights, it is human
rights, democracy and the rule of law that are under siege.
We are
always proud to stand in solidarity with our courageous colleagues, and we once
again demand their immediate release.
The world is watching.
Signatures:
Amsterdam Bar
Association
Asociación Libre de Abogadas y
Abogados, Madrid (ALA)
AVOCATS.BE – Order of
French- and German-speaking bar associations of Belgium
Berlin Bar Association
Bologna Bar Association
Bordeaux Bar Association
Brussels Bar
Associaton
Conférence Régionale
des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
Criminal Committee of the
International Association of Lawyers
Defense Without
Borders – Solidarity Lawyers, France (DSF-AS)
Dutch League for Human Rights
Épinal Bar Association
European
Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
European Democratic Lawyer (AED)
Fair Trial Watch
Foundation Day of the Endangered
Lawyer
Hauts-de-Seine Bar
Association
Human Right Institution of Montpellier
La Conférence des Bâtonniers de France
Lawyers for Lawyers
Liege-Huy Bar Association
Lyon Bar Association
Marseille Bar
Association
Montpellier Bar
Association
National Association
of Democratic Jurists, Italy (GD)
National Lawyers
Guild, US
Republikanischer
Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
Syndicat des Avocats
de France
Syndicat des Avocats
Pour la Démocratie, Belgium
The Association for
the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
The Center of Research
and Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
The German Federal Bar
The International
Observatory for Lawyers in Danger (OIAD) composed by 47 bar associations from
Spain, France, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Belgium, Turkey, Cameroon and
Democratic Republic of Congo
Toulouse Bar
UIA-IROL (the
Institute for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers)
En 2013, il
y a dix ans, un procès de masse a débuté contre 22 avocates et avocats, tous
membres de l’organisation d’avocats Progressive Lawyers’ Association (ÇHD,
Turquie) et du People’s Law Office (HHB). Depuis, jusqu’à trois audiences ont
eu lieu chaque année – d’abord devant la “Cour d’assises spéciale”
(la Haute Cour pénale), puis, en 2014, après un changement dans la loi de
procédure pénale de la Turquie, devant la Haute Cour penale ordinaire.
Tous les avocats en question ont été condamnés ou font
l’objet de poursuites pour leurs activités professionnelles. En violation des Principes
de base des Nations unies relatifs au rôle du barreau, ils sont, d’une part,
identifiés aux causes de leurs clients et, d’autre part, limités dans leur
liberté d’expression, qui inclut le droit de prendre part à des débats publics
sur les droits de l’homme.
Plusieurs des accusés, dont le président du ÇHD, Selçuk
KOZAGAÇLI, ont déjà été soumis à des années de détention provisoire. L’une des
accusées de ce procès, Ebru Timtik, est mort pendant sa grève de la faim pour
obtenir des procès équitables devant les tribunaux turcs.
Des avocats d’Europe et d’autres continents ont observé
toutes les audiences. Cette semaine, les observateurs internationaux
comprennent plus de 60 avocats de huit pays européens et des États-Unis :
Autriche, Belgique, France, Allemagne, Grèce, Italie, Pays-Bas,
Espagne/Catalogne et États-Unis. Les avocats représentent divers barreaux
locaux, des confédérations européennes et internationales de barreaux et
d’autres organisations d’avocats.
L’article 10 de la Déclaration universelle des droits de
l’homme et l’article 14 du Pacte international relatif aux droits civils et
politiques imposent à la Turquie de garantir à tous les prévenus un procès
équitable et public devant un tribunal compétent, indépendant et impartial.
Auparavant,
en 2021, à l’occasion de la Journée internationale du procès équitable, dédiée
la Turquie cette année-là, le jury est arrivé à la conclusion que ces normes
internationales pour un procès équitable sont fréquemment violées en Turquie.
Cette
semaine, les observateurs internationaux suivent de très près le procès de ÇHD
afin de déterminer si le tribunal respectera les normes internationales en
matière de procès équitable et si les violations antérieures de ces principes
au cours de ce procès seront corrigées par le tribunal.
Les procès contre les avocats de ÇHD s’inscrivent dans un
schéma plus large d’attaque contre les avocats en Turquie et d’identification
de ceux-ci avec leurs clients. Les avocats sont injustement criminalisés et
poursuivis pour avoir rempli leurs obligations professionnelles. Cette
situation est intolérable et constitue une violation manifeste du droit
international. De plus, les observateurs internationaux ont conclu que les
normes internationales du procès équitable n’ont pas été respectées lors des
audiences qu’ils ont observées précédemment.
Nous demandons donc la libération immédiate de tous les
avocats incarcérés en raison de leur travail sur des affaires politiques. Ce
n’est pas un crime d’être un avocat. Nous continuerons d’insister pour mettre
fin à la criminalisation du simple exercice de la profession d’avocat et pour
faire respecter les principes fondamentaux de l’État de droit, y compris le
droit à un procès équitable pour tous, en Turquie et ailleurs dans le monde.
Signataires:
European Association of
Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
La Conférence des
bâtonniers
L’association Défense
Sans frontière – Avocats Solidaires (Defense Without Borders – Solidarity
Lawyers, France (DSF-AS)
Giuristi Democratici – Association
nationale des juristes démocrates, Italie
UIA-IROL (the Institute for
the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers)
Lawyers for Lawyers, Pays
Bas
Le Barreau fédéral
allemand
Union of Italian Penal
Chambers (UCPI)
Republikanischer Anwältinnen
– und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
L’Observatoire
International des Avocats en Danger (OIAD)
The Center of Research and
Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
L’association catalane
pour la Défense de droits de l’homme
La commission de défense
de l’association du Barreau de Barcelona
Le Barreau de New York
City
The Foundation of the
Day of the Endangered Lawyer
The Dutch League for
Human Rights
Avocats Européens
Démocrates / European Democratic Lawyers
The Association for the
Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
L’association du Barreau
de Marseille
Fair Trial Watch
L’association du Barreau
de Berlin
L’association du Barreau
de Bordeaux
Conférence Régionale des
Bâtonniers de l Ouest
L’association du Barreau
de Epinal
The International
Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)
National Union of
People’s Lawyers, the Philippines (NULP)
Asociación Americana de
Juristas
Confederation of Lawyers
of Asia and the Pacific (COLAP)
L’association du Barreau
de Bruxelles
AVOCATS.BE – l’Ordre des
associations des barreaus germanophones et francophones de Belgique
Syndicat des Avocats
Pour la Démocratie
OBFG Association de l’Ordre
des avocats germanophones et francophones de Belgique
In 2013, ten
years ago, a mass trial started against 22 lawyers, all of them members of the
lawyers organisation Progressive Lawyers’ Association (ÇHD, Turkey) and of the
Peoples Law Office (HHB). Since then up to three hearings have taken place each
year – first before the “Special Assize Court” (the Heavy Penal Court), then,
in 2014, after a change in penal procedural law of Turkey, before the ordinary
Heavy Penal Court.
All lawyers in question were convicted or face charges
for their professional activities. In violation of the UN Basic Principles on
the Role of Lawyers, they are, firstly, identified with their clients’ causes,
and, secondly, limited in their freedom of expression, which includes the right
to take part in public discussions about human rights.
Several of the defendants, among them the ÇHD
president Selçuk KOZAGAÇLI, have already been subject to years of pretrial detention.
One of the defendants in this trial, Ebru Timtik, died during her hunger strike
seeking fair trials in the courts of Turkey.
Lawyers from Europe and other continents have observed
all hearings. This week the International Observers include more than 60 lawyers
from 8 European countries and the USA: Austria, Belgium, France,
Germany, Greece, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain/Catalonia, and the US. The
lawyers represent various local Bar Associations, European and International
Bar confederations, and other lawyers’ organisations.
Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights and Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights require Turkey to provide all defendants with a fair and public trial by
a competent, independent, and impartial court.
Previously, in
2021, on the occasion of the International Fair Trial Day, which focused on
Turkey that year, the jury came to the conclusion that these international standards
for a fair trial are frequently violated in Turkey.
This week, the
International Observers are monitoring the ÇHD trial very closely to determine
whether the court will adhere to international fair trial standards and whether
prior violations of these principles in the course of this trial will be remedied
by the court.
The trials against the lawyers of ÇHD are part of a
larger pattern of attacking lawyers in Turkey and identifying them with their
clients. Lawyers are unjustly criminalized and prosecuted for fulfilling their
professional duties. This is intolerable and in clear violation of
international law. Further, the International Observers have concluded that
international fair trial standards have not been respected in the hearings they
have previously observed.
Therefore we demand the immediate release of all
lawyers incarcerated based on their work on political cases. It is not a crime
to be a lawyer. We will continue to insist on ending the criminalization of
merely exercising the profession of lawyers and on upholding the fundamental
principles of the rule of law, including the right to a fair trial for all
people in Turkey and elsewhere throughout the world.
Signatories:
European Association
of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights, ELDH
La Conférence des
bâtonniers
L’association Défense
Sans frontière – Avocats Solidaires (Defense Without Borders – Solidarity
Lawyers, France (DSF-AS)
Giuristi Democratici
– National Association of Democratic Jurists, Italy
UIA-IROL (the Institute
for the Rule of Law of the International Association of Lawyers)
Lawyers for Lawyers,
the Netherlands
The German Federal
Bar
Union of Italian
Penal Chambers (UCPI)
Republikanischer
Anwältinnen – und Anwälteverein e.V. (RAV)
The International
Observatory for Lawyers in Danger (OIAD)
The Center of Research and
Elaboration on Democracy/ Legal International Intervention Group
The Catalan
Association for the Defense of Human Rights
The Barcelona Bar
Association’s Defence Commission
The New York City Bar
Association
The Foundation of the
Day of the Endangered Lawyer
The Dutch League for
Human Rights
Avocats Européens
Démocrates / European Democratic Lawyer
The Association for
the Support of Fundamental Rights Athens, Greece
Marseille Bar
Association
Fair Trial Watch
Berlin Bar
Association
Bordeaux Bar
Association
Conférence Régionale
des Bâtonniers de l Ouest
Epinal Bar
Association
The International
Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)
National Union of
People’s Lawyers, the Philippines (NULP)
Asociación Americana
de Juristas
Confederation of
Lawyers of Asia and the Pacific (COLAP)
Brussels Bar
Associaton
AVOCATS.BE – Order of
French- and German-speaking bar associations of Belgium
Syndicat des Avocats
Pour la Démocratie
OBFG German and
French speaking Bar Association of Belgium
Focus Country of 2022: Egypt / Call for Nominations for the Ebru Timtik Award
Hold the Date – 17-18 June 2022, Palermo/Italy
The
right to a fair trial has long been recognised by the international community
as a fundamental human right. Without a fair trial, every individual risks
becoming the victim of a miscarriage of justice, either as an innocent suspect
wrongly convicted, or as a victim unable to secure justice for a wrong
perpetrated against him or her.
In 2021, an annual International Fair
Trial Day was established with a steering group, and the event was supported by
more than 100 legal associations. The first conference was held as a virtual
event on 14 June 2021 with a focus on fair trial rights in Turkey. It was
agreed that in each subsequent year a new focus country where fair trial rights
are being challenged would be chosen as the focus country. The Steering Group also decided to establish an Ebru
Timtik Award, in recognition of her sacrifice for the right to a fair trial. This award will be granted every year to an
individual and/or an organisation from the focus country chosen for that year
for the International Fair Trial Day or to an individual and/or an organisation
who has been active in defending and or promoting the right to a fair trial in
that specific country. An International Fair Trial Day Alliance was also formed
among prominent bar associations and lawyers’ organisations across the world which
support the initiative.
After considering several proposals for
the focus country of the 2022 International Fair Trial Day, the Steering Group have now decided that the focus country for this year is
Egypt.
The
decision is based on the following:
Judicial independence is severely eroded in Egypt,
which means that the right to an independent and impartial tribunal is violated
in most, if not all, cases (especially against human rights lawyers, human
rights defenders, journalists, and opposition politicians). Reports confirm a wide
range of systemic violations of the right to a fair trial in the country, including
arbitrary detention, arrests, or prosecutions of opponents or perceived
opponents. There also has been a failure to effectively prosecute and punish crimes
committed by state-affiliated forces, such as unlawful or arbitrary killings – including
extrajudicial killings -, forced disappearances, torture, and cases of cruel,
inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment. Whilst this amounts to a
violation of the rights of the victims of these crime and does not of itself
amount to a violation of fair trial rights, it is further evidence that the
police and prosecutors are failing in their duty to carry out effective and
independent investigations and uphold the rule of law so that an atmosphere of
impunity in relation to the acts of state-affiliated forces exists.[1]
This dire picture is recognised in a number of reports from prominent human
rights organisations. The country is classified as ‘not free’ by Freedom House,
underlining – under the rule of law ranking – serious fair trial rights issues.[2]
Furthermore, the World Justice Project’s 2021 Rule of Law index ranks Egypt at 136
out of 139 countries.[3]
Reports indicate that the executive branch in Egypt exerts influence
over the courts, which typically protect the interests of the government,
military, and security apparatus and have often disregarded due process and
other basic safeguards in cases against the government’s political opponents or
where there is perceived dissent. Constitutional amendments made in 2019 further
strengthened the Egyptian President’s supervisory powers over the judiciary and
undermined its independence. The changes allowed the President to appoint the
heads of judicial bodies and authorities, choosing from among several
candidates nominated by their governing councils.[4]
The President also serves as the veto-wielding head of the Supreme Council for
Judicial Bodies and Authorities, which controls appointments and disciplinary
matters for the judiciary. The chief justice of the Supreme Constitutional
Court[5]
is now chosen by the President from among its most senior members. Since the
new provision took effect in June 2019, the Egyptian President has already used
it twice to appoint new SCC presidents by decree, in July 2019 and now on
February 8, 2022.
Law no 162 of 1958 (“the Emergency Law”) established
the institution of the Emergency State Security Court (ESSC) to adjudicate
crimes that violate the terms of a “state of emergency”.⁹ In 2017, the Prime
Minister transferred “protesting” and “terrorism-related” offences to the
jurisdiction of the ESSC, to which was added crimes from first two chapters of
the Penal Code, including those relating to ’spreading fake news’ in January
2021.
Many detained government critics and opposition figures have been prosecuted
by the ESSC since the state of emergency was declared in 2017; the state of
emergency has been repeatedly renewed and remained in effect until late 2021.
Decisions of the ESSC are not subject to appeal but instead are subject to executive-branch
approval, as the President can suspend any of their rulings and order retrials.
Although the constitution limited military trials of civilians to crimes
directly involving the military, its personnel, or its property, a 2014
presidential decree placed all “public and vital facilities” under military
jurisdiction, resulting in the referral of thousands of civilian defendants to
military courts. That expansion of jurisdiction was effectively incorporated
into the constitution in 2019.[6]
Additional, restrictive new emergency measures enacted in 2020 were
justified as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In May 2020, President Sisi
approved and signed into law amendments to Emergency Law no. 162 of 1958 that
banned all forms of public gatherings and demonstrations and gave police
greater powers to make arrests. It further expanded the jurisdiction of the
military judicial system over civilians by giving the President the power to
authorize the military to investigate and prosecute crimes that violate the
Emergency Law. Authorities also used the COVID-19 pandemic to justify skipping
renewal hearings for pretrial detention orders. Although the state of emergency
has been lifted since October 2021, there are ongoing trials of dozens of
arbitrarily detained human rights defenders, activists, opposition politicians
and peaceful protesters by emergency courts where proceedings are inherently
unfair. [7]
The extension of military jurisdiction in Egypt is in
itself is a violation of the right to a fair trial under the African Charter on
Human and Peoples’ Rights and the ICCPR, insofar as the necessity of applying
such jurisdiction over civilians is almost never justified. This is in addition
to other fair trial rights that are routinely violated in Egyptian courts,
including military tribunals, such as the right to access counsel and the right
to prepare a defence. The hearings at military tribunals are not open to the public.
Other abuses of fair trial rights include the use of the Counter-terrorism Law, the Protest Law, the
NGO Law, the Media Law, the Cybercrime Law, and the Penal Code to harass,
arrest, and prosecute lawyers and human rights defenders, and there are many
examples of arrest, detention, death in custody, and enforced disappearance of
lawyers and human rights defenders. The mass trials against protesters is
another practice raising fair trial rights issues.
The lack of a fair trial directly affects lawyers and
other human rights defenders at risk, many of whom are convicted and sentenced
to long prison sentences and sometimes even the death penalty (which is still
being imposed and carried out in Egypt). Reports underline an increased use of
the death penalty and executions, many handed down following mass trials fundamentally
lacking fair trial guarantees. Accordingly, 80 people were executed in only the
first 6 months of 2021, ranking Egypt as the third-worst country in numbers of
executions worldwide.[8]
The African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights has
adopted several resolutions about the situation in Egypt underlining, amongst
other issues, the systemic violation of fair trial rights in the country. The calls
made to the government, cited below, in a February 2015 resolution provide a
strong indication of the seriousness of the issues:
“The Commission:
Condemns the Arab
Republic of Egypt’s disregard to regional and international fair trial
standards, the unlawful imposition of mass death sentences, and the persecution
of journalists and human rights defenders;
Calls upon the
Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt to comply with the African Charter,
the Principles and Guidelines on Fair Trial, the Declaration on Freedom of
Expression, and other instruments to which Egypt is a party;
Urges the
Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt to put an end to the harassment,
arbitrary arrest, detention and sentencing of journalists, human rights
defendants, and individuals who express dissenting views regarding the
Government’s actions;
Strongly urges the
Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt to observe an immediate moratorium
on the death sentences and to reflect on the possibility of abolishing capital
punishment;
Invites the
Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt to ratify the Second Optional
Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights aiming at
the abolition of the death penalty; and
Calls on the
Government of the Arab Republic of Egypt to investigate all human rights
violations perpetrated in the country and prosecute authors of these violations.”
In an October 2021
decision, the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights concluded that the
Emergency Law of Egypt contravened the African Charter on Human and Peoples’
Rights and requested the government to reform domestic laws to prevent
recurring human rights violations. Although the decision concerns arrest and
detention of an applicant several years ago, the Commission found that the law
which is still in force and used as the pretext to justify ongoing systemic
violations was not in line with the African Charter.[10]
In July 2021, UN Expert Mary Lawlor pointed out the
ongoing violations in Egypt and highlighted a common trend across multiple
cases, whereby human rights defenders are often arrested without a warrant and
detained incommunicado at an unknown location and subjected to enforced
disappearance, before being presented before the Supreme State Security
Prosecution. Their pre-trial detention pending investigation is then ordered
for alleged acts criminalized under the vague provisions of the Penal Code,
Anti-Terror Law and Anti-Cybercrime Law.[11]
In January 2022, a
statement was issued by 65 human rights organizations, and it was underlined
that the fair trial standards are routinely flouted in trials before ESSCs,
including the right to adequate defence and rights to a public hearing. Defence
lawyers have been prevented from communicating with their clients in private
and prevented from photocopying the casefiles, indictments and verdicts.[12]
Focusing the next
International Fair Trial Day on Egypt will help draw more attention to the
systemic fair trial violations in the country. It will provide support to many,
including lawyers (at least 35 that we know of), human rights defenders,
journalists, political opponents or perceived opponents who are still being
arbitrarily detained there, often under unacceptable prison conditions and
facing trials severely undermining the fair trial principles.
We are writing at this stage to advise you of
this initiative and to invite your organisation to support International Fair Trial Day and attend the conference which will be hosted by Palermo
Bar Association and held in Palermo, Italy between 17-18 June 2022. Further
details of the programme
and of the speakers who will address the conference will follow over the next
few months. For now, we would ask you to hold the date.
Call for nominations for the Ebru Timtik Award
We also would like to invite you to nominate one or more individual(s) or an
organisation for the Ebru Timtik Award among those who have demonstrated
outstanding commitment and sacrifice in upholding fundamental values related to
the right to a fair trial in Egypt. The individual(s) or organisation nominated
for the award must be or have been active in defending
and or promoting the right to a fair trial in Egypt through either
his/her/its recent outstanding piece of work in relation to this fundamental
right or his/her/its distinguished long-term involvement in fair trial issues.
The deadline for nominations is 16 May 2022. To nominate, please send your
nominations to nominationsetaward@gmail.com and kindly include: (1) the candidate’s
detailed bio, (2) a letter signed by the nominating organisation/group of
individuals explaining the reasons why they/it consider(s) that the candidate
should be granted the Award, and (3) one recommendation/supporting letter from
an unrelated, external organisation, if the application
is submitted by a group of individuals.
For the details of the award criteria and
process please see the attached “Selection criteria for the grant of the Ebru
Timtik Fair Trial Award”. After the deadline, a jury composed of independent individuals who are
experienced with the right to a fair trial, including one or more from the
focus country, will determine the nominations and reach a decision.
Today, 14 June 2021, marks the inaugural International Fair Trial Day (IFTD) which will be
observed for the first time worldwide. The focus country of the IFTD this year is Turkey, a country
that is and has been suffering for many years, from systemic human rights violations and a serious
lack of fair trial standards. On the occasion of the IFTD, drawing attention to the deteriorating
situation in the country, the undersigned organisations call upon the Turkish authorities to take
the necessary steps urgently to instate the right to a fair trial in Turkey and to create an
environment under which these fundamental procedural rights can effectively be protected. The
undersigned organisations also call upon the international community to increase their efforts to
draw attention to the situation in Turkey with a particular focus on the issues around the fair trial
principles.
Background of the IFTD
In response to the serious failure of the judicial system in Turkey to protect and respect fair trial
principles, lawyers Ebru Timtik and Aytaç Ünsal began a hunger strike in January 2020. They
expressed a common demand of many thousands who were subjected to arbitrary investigations,
trials, arrests, detentions, and wrongful convictions. They called on the Turkish government to
comply with its obligations to secure and respect the right to a fair trial and to end practices
constituting systemic violations of this fundamental right. On 5 April 2020, on Lawyers’ Day in
Turkey, they turned their hunger strike into a death fast to underline the vital importance of this
demand. Ebru Timtik lost her life on 27 August 2020, the 238th day of her death fast, while Aytaç
Ünsal ended his protest on 4 September 2020 following a temporary release order by the
Supreme Court which was later withdrawn. He was returned to prison on 10 December 2020.
Fundamental rights and freedoms and principles of the rule of law are under attack not only in
Turkey but globally. In many countries, including European countries, there are reports
documenting governmental oppression and practices undermining international human rights
obligations. Thus, those who carry out activities to condemn, draw attention to and criticise these
practices are under constant pressure from the state apparatus, including pressure from the
judiciary, whose independence and impartiality is being seriously undermined. Attempts are
being made to silence lawyers, human rights defenders, journalists, opposition politicians,
academics and many others raising their voices against such policies through baseless
accusations against them, e.g. under anti-terror legislation, a practice that has been referred to
as ‘judicial harassment’.
The International Fair Trial Day was established along with the Ebru Timtik Award to advocate for
the re-establishment of fair trial rights in those countries where fair trial rights are under serious
threat. The occasion will be used by the international community to focus on the situation in the
country chosen for that year as the focus country and to draw attention to the fair trial issues
faced there. Also, an annual Ebru Timtik Award will be granted to an individual and/or an
organisation from the focus country that has been active in defending and or promoting the right
to a fair trial in that specific country.
Taking into account the background of the IFTD and the continuing deterioration of the situation
in the country, Turkey was chosen this year as the focus country. In future years other countries
will be chosen to reflect the challenges to the right to fair trial being experienced in those
respective jurisdictions.
Call to Action on Turkey
The state of human rights and rule of law in Turkey have been declining particularly since the
Gezi Park protests in 2013 which were followed by the collapse of the peace talks in 2015 and
the state of emergency declared after the 15 July 2016 coup attempt which remained in place
for 2 years until July 2018. The mistreatment of lawyers, journalists, human rights defenders,
opposition politicians, academics, and others who are critical of the current situation reflects a
far wider practice in the country of failing to respect fair trial rights, among other fundamental
rights and freedoms, especially since the attempted coup of July 2016.
The rapid deterioration seen in human rights has been widely reported and reflected on by the
international community, including the UN and Council of Europe organs, each of which has
identified serious issues ranging from the lack of independence of the judiciary to the collapse of
the main pillars of a democratic system, including separation of powers. Criticisms from these
international bodies and from the international community generally have been far ranging from
undue interference in fundamental rights and freedoms for political purposes to serious violation
of political participation rights of the minority groups such as Kurds.1
Reflecting on the issues identified in these reports, we the undersigned organisations, call on the
Turkish authorities to implement the following steps to ensure full protection of the right to a
1 See e.g. the Working Group on the United Nations Universal Periodic Review, adopted on 29 September 2020 at
the 45th session of the Human Rights Council of the UN; Committee on the Honouring of Obligations and
Commitments by Member States of the Council of Europe (Monitoring Committee), the functioning of democratic
institutions in Turkey, Report | Doc. 15272 | 21 April 2021, https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-
XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=29155&lang=en ; World Justice Project, Rule of Law Index 2020,
https://worldjusticeproject.org/our-work/research-and-data/wjp-rule-law-index-2020
fair trial in the country and to create an environment enabling effective protection of its
underlying principles:
take necessary legislative and other measures to ensure the independence and
impartiality of the judiciary and end all practices constituting direct interference, pressure
or influence with respect to judicial conduct, including those from the executive;
implement the recommendation of the numerous human rights oversight mechanisms,
including of the Human Rights Council in the UN Universal Periodic Review2 and Venice
Commission,3 to introduce a constitutional amendment to make the Council of Judges
and Prosecutors independent of the executive and ensure that its decisions are open to
judicial review;
amend the relevant articles of the Turkish Penal Code and the Law No. 3713 on Prevention
of Terrorism, that are found to be broad, vague and arbitrarily applied against critical
voices, to meet the requirements of clarity and foreseeability and the principles of legal
certainty and no punishment without law;
immediately end the systematic abuse, detention and prosecution of lawyers, judges,
other legal professionals, journalists, human rights defenders, opposition politicians,
academics and others where there is no cogent evidence of specific criminal misconduct
presented in proceedings that comply with international fair trial standards;
guarantee and respect the principle of presumption of innocence in all criminal
investigations and prosecutions;
stop any practices preventing enjoyment of the rights protected under international
human rights treaties such as freedoms of expression, association and peaceful assembly,
including by way of using the exercise of such freedoms as grounds for arbitrary
prosecutions and lengthy and punitive pretrial detention;
ensure that the rights to fair trial embodied in article 6 of the European Convention on
Human Rights and article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights are
respected in all criminal prosecutions in Turkey’s criminal courts at all levels;
repeal state of emergency amendments passed into law, which amendments seek to
enable the dismissal of judges and prosecutors without a fair hearing and which seek to
limit the rights of lawyers to discharge their professional duties, the rights of suspects to
legal counsel, and the right of lawyer-client communications, as well as to impose other
2 Ibid.
3 European Commission for Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission), Draft Opinion on dhe Draft Law on
Judges and Prosecutors of Turkey, 8 March 2011, opinion no 610/2011,
https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL(2011)003-e
limitations on the justice system, as outlined in the report of Human Rights Watch
published in April 20194;
end the practice of mass trials of lawyers, judges, journalists, opposition politicians, human rights defenders and others, in particular on bogus charges, such as the charge of membership in a terrorist organization, aimed at preventing their legitimate activities and silencing them; and
create an open dialogue with the international oversight mechanisms and national and international NGOs to address and resolve the structural human right issues in the country and, as a first step, promptly agree to requests by the UN Special Rapporteur on Judges and Lawyers and other special procedures to conduct country visits to Turkey. We call on the international community to respond effectively to the deteriorating state of human rights and rule of law in Turkey and to increase its efforts to effectively address these issues with international stakeholders for increased awareness and attention.
The International Fair Trial Day will take place on the 14th of June 2021, from 15h to 17h45 and will include a panel discussion on the judiciary and civil society.
The right to a fair trial has long been recognised by the international community as a fundamental human right. Without a fair trial every individual risks becoming the victim of a miscarriage of justice. Either as an innocent suspect wrongly convicted, or as a victim unable to secure justice for a wrong perpetrated against them.
Ebru Timtik was one of 18 lawyers in Turkey who were members of the Progressive Lawyers Association, some of which were working at the People’s Law Office, made subject to a prosecution in the Istanbul 37th Assize Court under Articles 314 and 220 of the Turkish Penal Code for terrorist offences. She and her colleagues were convicted on 20 March 2019 after a trial during which basic procedural safeguards and internationally recognised fair trial principles were ignored. Her conviction was based on the testimony of anonymous witnesses, many of which gave inconsistent testimony in relation to alleged facts and time periods. Documents allegedly obtained from government authorities in Belgium and Holland were never authenticated but they were nevertheless used as grounds for convictions without her lawyers having access to them. The originals of digital documents which were allegedly seized in a musical centre were also not made available to the defence lawyers. They could not see, analyse or challenge these documents which were never shown to have existed. Lawyers acting in her defence were frequently prevented from participating in the proceedings and in some circumstances were excluded.
The defects in the trial process led Ebru Timtik together with one of her colleagues, Aytaç Ünsal, to commence a “death fast” following a hunger strike which began on 5 April 2020, the Turkish “Day of the Lawyer”. Sadly, on 27 August 2020 Ebru Timtik died whilst continuing to protest both her innocence of the charges on which she had been convicted, and the lack of respect for fundamental fair trial principles in the criminal justice system which had prejudiced both her and her colleagues, and many thousands of other individuals in Turkey.
In recognition of her sacrifice, and in order to focus attention on the plight of those in countries around the globe who are facing prosecution in circumstances where fair trial principles are not being observed or respected, a number of international bar associations and lawyers organisations have come together to arrange an annual “International Fair Trial Day” which will be observed every year on 14 June.
Steps are also being undertaken to introduce a new annual Ebru Timtik Award to recognise an individual or an organisation who has or which has made an exceptional contribution towards securing fair trial rights in the country on which the International Fair Trial Day is focusing for the year in question. Each year a conference will be held, either online or at a physical location in a country chosen because of the level of concern with regard to the lack of respect for fair trial rights in that jurisdiction at that time. There will also be events in the countries across the word on each International Fair Trial Day to raise awareness of the situation in the focus country. The steering group consisting of Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE), European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and World Human Rights (ELDH), European Bars Federation (FBE), European Democratic Lawyers (EDL-AED), French National Bar Council (CNB), International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL), International Association of Lawyers (UIA), International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI), Italian National Bar Council (CNF), Law Society of England and Wales, Lawyers for Lawyers (L4L), Ayşe Bingöl Demir and Serife Ceren Uysal agreed that the first conference will be held as a virtual event on 14 June 2021 and will focus on fair trial rights in Turkey.